Dear Prime
Minister and all MPs
who corrupted democracy to undermine Brexit,
The only rationalisation the 17.4
million LEAVE Voters can come to is that many ill-informed people are either extremely DUMB
or are TRAITORS trying to sell-out this great country of ours.....
Your collective behaviour has been shameful and heinous to the extreme towards the health and security of this country. The UK Parliament is a disgrace and has proven to be shameful
for this country. You were voted into
Parliament on the basis of a Party Manifesto, in which you stated that you
would honour the decision of the Brexit Referendum. Yet this last three years has seen democracy
in this country corrupted by self-serving unpatriotic actors, who would rather
hand over the keys to our great country than believe in our country that is
filled with inspirational, tenacious, entrepreneurial and intelligent people
who will make sure this country remains a great country with or without the EU
and irrespective of how we individually feel about Brexit.
As our elected Parliamentary
representatives in Westminster, the people of this GREAT COUNTRY fully expect
you to honour the will of the people faithfully. We the people want to make sure that you are
aware of the sentiments of this patriotic UK constituency;
"Leave MEANS Leave". (Defined as; leaving both the customs
union and the single market, taking back control of our Laws, Borders, Money
and Trade.)
Why did we come to have a BREXIT in the
first place..... can you even remember or are there so many political mistruths
that have been sprouted by Politicians that most of you have forgotten in the
fog of spin and political shenanigans, why?
If I was to BOIL why we had a Brexit
DOWN TO ONE ISSUE it would be about SOVEREIGNTY, yes, our remaining a sovereign
country....... because if we maintain our sovereignty, we also have these under
our control; leaving both the customs union and the
single market, taking back control of our Laws, Borders, Money and Trade.
Now clearly some of the Politicians have
been having issues understanding what the words "sovereignty and democracy" mean and how important it
is to those of us that love this country and do not want to hand over our
sovereignty to the Franco-German alliance (with the modern versions of Napoleon
and Hitler), like some of those more feckless, frivolous people on the Remain
side of the equation who are prepared to corrupt democracy to do.
Let us ALL get re-acquainted with the
meaning of these two words!
Merriam-Webster Definition of sovereignty
a) supreme power especially over a body politic
b) freedom from external control : autonomy
c) controlling influence
d) one that is sovereign especially: an autonomous state
Before we go on, let us consider the
definition of democracy from Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary.......
Merriam-Webster Definition of democracy
a) government by the people especially : rule of the majority
b) a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
WHICH OF THOSE TWO
DEFINITIONS ARE YOU STILL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH?
So, tick-tock Prime Minister, which is
it to be, LEAVE and honour the referendum decision and keep this a sovereign
country or REMAIN in Europe, which would be tantamount to spewing vomit over
the graves of all those souls that fought in the TWO GREAT WARS to afford us the
freedoms we have today, as a result of their sacrifice?
Over 60% of the British populace, are
extremely confused by how supposedly intelligent Politicians who have had the
privilege of being voted into seats in this great Parliament of our great country,
and how you could be so manipulative to think that the public would FORGIVE you
for NOT honouring this campaign promise.
Yes, you have been forgiven many times before, for over a century of
lies, manipulations, political spin and get out of jail free cards you all hand
one another, with exception of those who do NOT toe the Party line and you have
cast to the wolves to placate the masses.
WHAT
IS IT TO BE PRIME MINISTER?
Did you and those clinging to their jobs
lie to the public on the TORY manifesto, or have you been fabricating this
whole Brexit process and deceiving the nation so that you could force the UK
into accepting your sad compromised, flawed, abhorrent abomination of a
withdrawal deal?
We are so flabbergasted by the gross
incompetence your office and Westminster's Politicians have demonstrated on the
world stage, that we have to ask you again, which part of "leave means
leave" did you lot not understand?
If you have any doubts as to why your
'pitiful deal' is unsatisfactory and why the 'no deal' looks appealing, let us
help you........ please read on.
HERE ARE 55 REASONS WHY MRS MAY’S DEAL IS AN ABOMINATION
The first 15
fundamental reasons why Mrs May’s Withdrawal Agreement is an abomination
1.
From
29 March the UK will be under the de facto jurisdiction of a group of 27
foreign powers, with no ability
to veto laws or procedures affecting our country and its citizens
2.
The
EU27 can make decisions in Council behind closed doors, with no published minutes,
which would profoundly affect British businesses, citizens, and the economy
3.
The
EU27 could even impose new taxes on the UK, and Parliament could do nothing
about it
4.
The
EU27 could cripple the vitally-important UK financial sector, with new taxes and
regulations
5.
A
major part of the Agreement (the Northern Irish Protocol) locks the UK into a
permanent customs union with
the EU, with no unilateral right of the UK to terminate
6.
The
Northern Ireland Protocol requires the Province to obey existing and new Single
Market rules, with no say over them, and effectively
splits off Northern Ireland into being a colony of the EU and the Republic,
thereby breaking the United Kingdom in two
7.
The
UK will have no right to do international free trade deals –a key economic
benefit of Brexit –because it must stick to protectionist EU tariffs. The
British public cannot benefit from an independent trade policy resulting in
much cheaper imported goods, nor can our exporters thrive
8.
Any
new EU trade agreements would require the UK to match the new lower tariffs,
but the countries involved
would not be required to reciprocate in respect of the UK
9.
The
UK would remain under the jurisdiction of the ECJ until at least the end of
2020 and the agreement makes provision to extend this until 2022
10.
In
some parts of the law, British courts would have to obey the ECJ for over 100
years -the lifetimes
of as yet unborn children
11.
The
UK would not be a truly sovereign nation in the lifetimes of all reading this
12.
The
Agreement means the UK paying at least £39 billion, despite there being no
legal obligation to pay anything
like that amount, and with no new UK-EU trade deal guaranteed in return
13.
The
final amount taken from British taxpayers would be decided by the EU, and the
UK would have no say because the ECJ would rule on this
14.
Other
aspects of the Agreement and Political Declaration would adversely affect the
UK’s autonomy in fishing,
defence, foreign policy, competition law, state aid and many other areas of
life
15.
The
Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration together lock the UK into a
continuing and subservient
relationship with the EU, agreeing to match and “build upon” current
arrangements, giving away money, sovereignty, laws, and even decisions on the
very composition of the United Kingdom itself.
The NEXT 40
"Hidden Horrors" of Theresa May's Brexit Deal
As the Spectator
explained in a piece published Saturday, the Brexiteers fear that the
current deal could leave the UK bound to the EU customs union indefinitely,
while surrounding any say in how the trade bloc sets its rules. In summary: The supposed ‘transition period’ could last indefinitely or, more specifically, to an undefined date sometime this century (“up to 31 December 20XX”, Art. 132). So while this Agreement covers what the government is calling Brexit, what we in fact get is: ‘transition’ + extension indefinitely (by however many years we are willing to pay for) + all of those extra years from the ‘plus 8 years’ articles.
Should it end within two years, as May hopes, the UK will still be signed up to clauses keeping us under certain rules (like VAT and ECJ supervision) for a further eight years. Some clauses have, quite literally, a “lifetime” duration (Art.39). If the UK defaults on transition, we go in to the backstop with the Customs Union and, realistically, the single market. We can only leave the transition positively with a deal. But we sign away the money. So the EU has no need to give us a deal, and certainly no incentive to make the one they offered ‘better’ than the backstop. The European Court of Justice remains sovereign, as repeatedly stipulated. Perhaps most damagingly of all, we agree to sign away the rights we would have, under international law, to unilaterally walk away. Again, what follows relates (in most part) for the “transition” period. But the language is consistent with the E.U. imagining that this will be the final deal.
In reference to the 560+ page draft deal document, while the controversial backstop provision has taken most of the criticism, many of the deal's finer points remain deeply suspect.
But the language surrounding the backstop isn't the only component of the deal that's deeply suspect. Below is a list of the top 40 draft deal "horrors" (courtesy of the Spectator):
- May says her deal means the UK leaves the EU next March. The Withdrawal Agreement makes a mockery of this. “All references to Member States and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.” (Art 6).
- Not quite what most people understand by Brexit. It goes on to spell out that the UK will be in the EU but without any MEPs, a commissioner or ECJ judges. We are effectively a Member State, but we are excused – or, more accurately, excluded – from attending summits. (Article 7)
- The European Court of Justice is decreed to be our highest court, governing the entire Agreement – Art. 4. stipulates that both citizens and resident companies can use it. Art 4.2 orders our courts to recognise this. “If the European Commission considers that the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties or under Part Four of this Agreement before the end of the transition period, the European Commission may, within 4 years after the end of the transition period, bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union”. (Art. 87)
- The jurisdiction of the ECJ will last until eight years after the end of the transition period. (Article 158).
- The UK will still be bound by any future changes to EU law in which it will have no say, not to mention having to comply with current law. (Article 6(2))
- Any disputes under the Agreement will be decided by EU law only – one of the most dangerous provisions. (Article 168).
- This cuts the UK off from International Law, something we’d never do with any foreign body. Arbitration will be governed by the existing procedural rules of the EU law – this is not arbitration as we would commonly understand it (i.e. between two independent parties). (Article 174)
- “UNDERLINING that this Agreement is founded on an overall balance of benefits, rights and obligations for the Union and the United Kingdom” No, it should be based upon the binding legal obligations upon the EU contained within Article 50. It is wrong to suggest otherwise.
- The tampon tax clause: We obey EU laws on VAT, with no chance of losing the tampon tax even if we agree a better deal in December 2020 because we hereby agree to obey other EU VAT rules for **five years** after the transition period. Current EU rules prohibit 0-rated VAT on products (like tampons) that did not have such exemptions before the country joined the EU.
- Several problems with the EU’s definitions: “Union law” is too widely defined and “United Kingdom national” is defined by the Lisbon Treaty: we should given away our right to define our citizens. The “goods” and the term “services” we are promised the deal are not defined – or, rather, will be defined however the EU wishes them to be. Thus far, this a non-defined term so far. This agreement fails to define it.
- The Mandelson Pension Clause: The UK must promise never to tax former EU officials based here – such as Peter Mandelson or Neil Kinnock – on their E.U. pensions, or tax any current Brussels bureaucrats on their salaries. The EU and its employees are to be immune to our tax laws. (Article 104)
- Furthermore, the UK agrees not to prosecute EU employees who are, or who might be deemed in future, criminals (Art.101)
- The GDPR clause. The General Data Protection Regulation – the EU’s stupidest law ever? – is to be bound into UK law (Articles 71 to 73). There had been an expectation in some quarters that the UK could get out of it.
- The UK establishes a ‘Joint Committee’ with EU representatives to guarantee ‘the implementation and application of this Agreement’. This does not sound like a withdrawal agreement – if it was, why would it need to be subject to continued monitoring? (Article 164).
- This Joint Committee will have subcommittees with jurisdiction over: (a) citizens’ rights; (b) “other separation provisions”; (c) Ireland/Northern Ireland; (d) Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus; (e) Gibraltar; and (f) financial provisions. (Article 165)
- The Lifetime clause: the agreement will last as long as the country’s youngest baby lives. “the persons covered by this Part shall enjoy the rights provided for in the relevant Titles of this Part for their lifetime”. (Article 39).
- The UK is shut out of all EU networks and databases for security – yet no such provision exists to shut the EU out of ours. (Article 8)
- The UK will tied to EU foreign policy, “bound by the obligations stemming from the international agreements concluded by the Union” but unable to influence such decisions. (Article 124)
- All EU citizens must be given permanent right of residence after five years – but what counts as residence? This will be decided by the EU, rather than UK rules. (Articles 15-16)
- Britain is granted the power to send a civil servant to Brussels to watch them pass stupid laws which will hurt our economy. (Article 34)
- The UK agrees to spend taxpayers’ money telling everyone how wonderful the agreement is. (Article 37)
- Art 40 defines Goods. It seems to include Services and Agriculture. We may come to discover that actually ‘goods’ means everything.
- Articles 40-49 practically mandate the UK’s ongoing membership of the Customs Union in all but name.
- The UK will be charged to receive the data/information we need in order to comply with EU law. (Article 50). The EU will continue to set rules for UK intellectual property law (Article 54 to 61). The UK will effectively be bound by a non-disclosure agreement swearing us to secrecy regarding any EU developments we have paid to be part. This is not mutual. The EU is not bound by such measures. (Article 74)
- The UK is bound by EU rules on procurement rules – which effectively forbids us from seeking better deals elsewhere. (Articles 75 to 78)
- We give up all rights to any data the EU made with our money (Art. 103)
- The EU decide capital projects (too broadly defined) the UK is liable for. (Art. 144)
- The UK is bound by EU state aid laws until future agreement – even in the event of an agreement, this must wait four years to be valid. (Article 93)
- Similar advantages and immunities are extended to all former MEPs and to former EU official more generally. (Articles 106-116)
- The UK is forbidden from revealing anything the EU told us or tells us about the finer points of deal and its operation. (Article 105).
- Any powers the UK parliament might have had to mitigate EU law are officially removed. (Article 128)
- The UK shall be liable for any “outstanding commitments” after 2022 (Article 142(2) expressly mentions pensions, which gives us an idea as to who probably negotiated this). The amount owed will be calculated by the EU. (Articles 140-142)
- The UK will be liable for future EU lending. As anyone familiar with the EU’s financials knows, this is not good. (Article143)
- The UK will remain liable for capital projects approved by the European Investment Bank. (Article 150).
- The UK will remain a ‘party’ (i.e. cough up money) for the European Development Fund. (Articles 152-154)
- And the EU continues to calculate how much money the UK should pay it. So thank goodness Brussels does not have any accountancy issues.
- The UK will remain bound (i.e coughing up money) to the European Union Emergency Trust Fund – which deals with irregular migration (i.e. refugees) and displaced persons heading to Europe. (Article 155)
- The agreement will be policed by ‘the Authority’ – a new UK-based body with ‘powers equivalent to those of the European Commission’. (Article 159)
- The EU admits, in Art. 184, that it is in breach of Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which oblige it to “conclude an agreement” of the terms of UK leaving the EU. We must now, it seems, “negotiate expeditiously the agreements governing their future relationship.” And if the EU does not? We settle down to this Agreement.
- And, of course, the UK will agree to pay £40bn to receive all of these ‘privileges’. (Article 138)
These 40 brought
to you
courtesy of the Spectator
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/11/the-top-40-horrors-lurking-in-the-small-print-of-theresa-mays-brexit-deal/
No comments:
Post a Comment