Slavery Rampant In Africa, Middle East; The West Wrongly Accuses Itself
The world has witnessed the total demise of integrity within the Mainstream Media (MSM) and the rise of a movement called Black Lives Matter (BLM), which has shown itself to be the most racist outfit on the planet. How did they achieve this? Well firstly by ignoring the truth of what actually happened in the world's history and making themselves victims to win over the Elite, MSN and Corporations in their bid for dominance over white people.
This organisation was headed up by a convicted terrorist and they set out to riot, maim, kill and rob people of their dignity, all in the name of Black Lives Matter. Sadly, they only helped to widen the divide in many societies around the world, their behaviour backfired and now they are on the run.
Read on.... these are excerpts from other articles written by people eminently more qualified to comment on racism than members of the public.
Authored by Giulio Meotti via The Gatestone Institute,
The United States abolished slavery 150 years ago, and has affirmative action for minorities. It is the country that elected a Black president, Barack Obama -- twice! Yet, a new movement is toppling one historic monument after another one, as if the US is still enslaving African-Americans. Activists in Washington DC even targeted an Emancipation Memorial, depicting President Abraham Lincoln, who paid with his life for freeing slaves.
Today slavery still exists in many parts of Africa and Middle East, but the self-flagellating Western public is obsessively focused only on the Western past of African slavery rather than on real, ongoing slavery, which is alive and well -- and ignored. For today's slaves, there are no demonstrations in the streets, no international political pressure, and virtually no articles in the media.
"We must not forget that Arab-Muslims have been champions in this field," Kamel Bencheikh, a Muslim poet, wrote in Le Matin d'Algerie.
See the full article in Zerohedge.com
The below insight into Africa and slavery was authored by a man of colour with considerable education and common sense -- JONES H. MUNANG'ANDU (author)
It
is possible to argue that Africans might have been better off if they
had been left entirely alone. This is to take a romantic view of the
disease, tribal warfare, slavery, and ignorance that were widespread on
the continent. Moreover, no African group that has glimpsed the
possibilities of Western progress has opted to return to purely African
primitivism. This suggests that Africans themselves would rather have
the benefits of Western technology than do without them. Given that
people naturally yearn for medical advance and material progress,
colonization was an obvious and striking benefit to Africa. The benefits
are particularly clear in any comparison of those parts of Africa that
were colonized with those that were not. In fact, African societies
south of the Sahara that had not had contact either with Europeans or
with Middle Eastern traders showed no signs of modern development.
No precontact African society had devised a written language or had discovered the wheel. None had a calendar, or built multi-story buildings. No African had learned how to domesticate animals. The smelting of iron was widespread, as was fire-hardened pottery, but the continent did not produce anything that could be called a mechanical device. It was trade with Europeans that introduced modernity to Iron Age Africa.
Far from hobbling and holding the continent back, colonization laid the foundations for whatever evidence of economic progress can now be found in Africa. It was Europeans who built roads and rail lines, introduced piped water, schools and telecommunications, and built national administrations. Nothing suggests that Africans would have achieved any of this on their own. There is no question but that life for Africans improved steadily under colonization. Africans had no concept of the biological origins of disease, and attributed personal misfortunes to the work of evil spirits. Slavery was widely practiced, and deeply rooted in Africa long before the arrival of Europeans. There is no reason to think that, left to themselves, Africans would have risen from the primitive conditions in which Europeans found them.
The European slave trade, though unquestionably harmful to Africa, was hardly the depopulating scourge it is often made out to be. When the 15th century Portuguese began sailing down the coast, they met long-established slave traders keen to sell off surpluses. Europeans almost never went on slaving expeditions into the interior. They bought slaves from dealers, which mean that other Africans first enslaved slaves taken from Africa.
For any knowledgeable African who has looked into the question as to 'What lessons can Africa learn from colonization? There seems to be little doubt that Africans have brought misery upon themselves. Whether it be in Africa, Haiti, or Washington (DC), Africans show little evidence of an ability to organize and run a modern economy. Just as economic refugees from Africa working in developed countries like Europe or United States in which they may form a majority community have failed to exercise authority, so have Africans desolated a continent bursting with riches. Of course, it is not permissible to conclude that this is because of natural, genetic handicaps from which blacks suffer, so anti-white arguments inevitably rush in to fill the explanatory void.
Blacks the world over, whether they live only among themselves or among people of other races, are said to lead lives of failure and misery only because whites have oppressed them in the past and continue to oppress them in the present. It makes no difference that this explanation falls apart under scrutiny. It is the only one that is permitted because the alternative does not conform to current political dogma. There can be no pleasure in saying so, but the facts point to one conclusion. Whether in Africa or America, Haiti or Great Britain, blacks are poor because they are, for the most part, incapable of lifting themselves from poverty. Africa is poor, just as Harlem is poor, because it is populated by Africans.
JONES H. MUNANG'ANDU (author)
One can draw one's own conclusion from these articles and their observations of what has transpired during the first seven months on 2020, suffice to say that it is important that this pernicious violent behaviour is stamped out of society by our Governments. They use these terror tactics and is not fit for any civilised society. The BLM participants have shown that they do not want to live in a civilised society, which means just like ISIS, they should be treated as terrorists because of the way they want to disrupt civilised society.
Write to your respective Members of Parliament, Congress and the Senate demanding that the Government categorise this outfit as a terrorist organisation and treat them as such.
No precontact African society had devised a written language or had discovered the wheel. None had a calendar, or built multi-story buildings. No African had learned how to domesticate animals. The smelting of iron was widespread, as was fire-hardened pottery, but the continent did not produce anything that could be called a mechanical device. It was trade with Europeans that introduced modernity to Iron Age Africa.
Far from hobbling and holding the continent back, colonization laid the foundations for whatever evidence of economic progress can now be found in Africa. It was Europeans who built roads and rail lines, introduced piped water, schools and telecommunications, and built national administrations. Nothing suggests that Africans would have achieved any of this on their own. There is no question but that life for Africans improved steadily under colonization. Africans had no concept of the biological origins of disease, and attributed personal misfortunes to the work of evil spirits. Slavery was widely practiced, and deeply rooted in Africa long before the arrival of Europeans. There is no reason to think that, left to themselves, Africans would have risen from the primitive conditions in which Europeans found them.
The European slave trade, though unquestionably harmful to Africa, was hardly the depopulating scourge it is often made out to be. When the 15th century Portuguese began sailing down the coast, they met long-established slave traders keen to sell off surpluses. Europeans almost never went on slaving expeditions into the interior. They bought slaves from dealers, which mean that other Africans first enslaved slaves taken from Africa.
For any knowledgeable African who has looked into the question as to 'What lessons can Africa learn from colonization? There seems to be little doubt that Africans have brought misery upon themselves. Whether it be in Africa, Haiti, or Washington (DC), Africans show little evidence of an ability to organize and run a modern economy. Just as economic refugees from Africa working in developed countries like Europe or United States in which they may form a majority community have failed to exercise authority, so have Africans desolated a continent bursting with riches. Of course, it is not permissible to conclude that this is because of natural, genetic handicaps from which blacks suffer, so anti-white arguments inevitably rush in to fill the explanatory void.
Blacks the world over, whether they live only among themselves or among people of other races, are said to lead lives of failure and misery only because whites have oppressed them in the past and continue to oppress them in the present. It makes no difference that this explanation falls apart under scrutiny. It is the only one that is permitted because the alternative does not conform to current political dogma. There can be no pleasure in saying so, but the facts point to one conclusion. Whether in Africa or America, Haiti or Great Britain, blacks are poor because they are, for the most part, incapable of lifting themselves from poverty. Africa is poor, just as Harlem is poor, because it is populated by Africans.
JONES H. MUNANG'ANDU (author)
One can draw one's own conclusion from these articles and their observations of what has transpired during the first seven months on 2020, suffice to say that it is important that this pernicious violent behaviour is stamped out of society by our Governments. They use these terror tactics and is not fit for any civilised society. The BLM participants have shown that they do not want to live in a civilised society, which means just like ISIS, they should be treated as terrorists because of the way they want to disrupt civilised society.
Write to your respective Members of Parliament, Congress and the Senate demanding that the Government categorise this outfit as a terrorist organisation and treat them as such.
No comments:
Post a Comment