THE SILVER LINING IN WHAT JUST HAPPENED ON JUNE 8TH 2017

Yes, "the Conservative Party failed to win in Labour's heartlands and lost ground in the south as voters rejected Theresa May's appeal to give her a personal mandate to negotiate Brexit," says TheTimes. May herself has been "humiliated" by the result...... they gleefully stated.

The media would have you believe that May's ship is dead in the water and the people are protesting in the streets baying for her head on a platter.  Instead of tabling all the positives about how well Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May both did in their own right, in the interests of this country.

As could be expected from the insidious PROGRESSIVE machine (see link), they have stirred up those on the left to immediately begin protesting outside Parliament, echoing Jeremy Corbyn, whose Labour party finished with 262 seats; who called on Theresa May to resign, arguing that the "politics of austerity" had been rejected. She must "make way for a government that would be truly representative of the people of this country", he said.

Are those on the left being duped by the media, or is this typical of the left, do they have very little rational thinking when it comes to losing elections and accepting the outcome of a democratic election? Also, as was expected of the main-stream media, they are making a big deal of this as headlines and the constant echoing of Corbyn's call for May to resign on their TV channels, simply because of their bias against conservatism (notice the little 'c') and their ratings.

If you are in any way confused by what is meant by PROGRESSIVISM or PROGRESSIVES, please take the time to read "TitanicBritain" by Joe Cater, which is an excellent 'BLUNT' eye opener for both sides of the political divide as to just how insidious and poisonous this movement is for each and every one of us.  Progressives are found in all parties....... they have infiltrated every walk of life over the last 50 years.  Read and weep because of how we have all been fooled by this odious disease.

Sadly for those unemotional, rational, logical thinking people of this great country, the left are illustrating to the right that as per usual cannot accept democracy and are protesting in the streets again, which is what the media love because it boosts their readership.

That said, every citizen of the United Kingdom should take a leaf out of the TV series; Monty Python's Life of Brian, and "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" the famous comedy song written by Monty Python member Eric Idle.

There is a SILVER LINING in what has just happened on June 8th 2017, whilst many feel that Theresa May's big gamble - to call a snap election, which she called three years before she had to - has backfired badly, or so the "Lame-Stream" media would have us believe. They say this because they want us to believe that stripping the Conservatives of their parliamentary majority and eroding away her personal authority and clout has damaged this country.  

Does this country need more elections, unrest, disruption and misinformation pedalled by the "Lame-Stream" media to further destroy our society and country?  What do you think?

However May has quite rightly for the sake of the country, chosen to hold onto her position as Prime Minister and has announced she will put together a government with the support of Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionists, (DUP). This will ensure the majority she requires to pull off the BREXIT negotiations and get the necessary Parliamentary sanction.

WHO ARE THE WINNERS AND LOSERS IN 2017

What the media are not telling the masses is that as Conservative, Theresa May has achieved the highest % of the votes for a generation beating - Cameron, Major and Thatcher.

The number of votes tells everyone just how well Theresa May actually did;
 

May obtained circa 13,667,213 votes, which was more than the 13,518,000 secured by Tony Blair in his famous 1997 landslide and 2,000,000 more than her predecessor David Cameron secured in his famous but ill fated 2015 GE triumph.

As mentioned in The Week, support for the Scottish National Party has crumbled, with the SNP losing a third of its seats, including those of former party leader Alex Salmond and current deputy leader Angus Robertson. 

Among the high-profile scalps taken by Labour in England was the former deputy PM and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, who lost his Sheffield Hallam constituency.

In Northern Ireland, both the SDLP and UUP have been wiped out, losing all of their seats at Westminster. "The confirmed results saw the DUP win ten seats, Sinn Fein win seven and independent candidate Lady Sylvia Hermon retain her seat in North Down," the BBC reports.

Some might say, thankfully, Ukip leader Paul Nuttall failed in his bid for the constituency of Boston and Skegness, securing a mere 3,308 votes – well short of the Conservative Matt Warman's tally of 27,271. The Ukip party ends the night without an MP, and less than a sixth of the share of the vote it received two year ago. Nuttall has stepped down as leader, and analysts are pondering whether this is the end of the party.

GIVING PRAISE AND CREDIT WHERE IT IS DUE.

Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn are in fact the heroes of this era.  Not only has May  achieved the highest % of the votes for a generation beating - Cameron, Major and Thatcher, Corbyn nearly annihilated the Tony Blair record as well with 12,874,985.

The calling of this snap election was in actual fact a blessing for the United Kingdom, as illustrated by the silver lining points below; it will also be seen in decades to come as a stroke of genius by Theresa May, as it consolidated several positions of concern, strengthened the union of the United Kingdom and removed the threat of Theresa May acting without a mandate as an elected Prime Minister.

SO WHY IS THIS GOOD FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM?

1. We now have the most pro-Brexit House of Commons ever elected. More than 90% of MP's have been returned for Parties that are promising to leave the EU, namely the Conservatives, Labour and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). This has given Article 50 an unarguable authority.

2. In the run up to before May called the 2017 election, she was lambasted by the left wing pundits in their attempts to undermine what she was doing, with the point that she was not a duly elected Prime Minister. May is no longer an unelected Prime Minister, she has her own mandate, she has been elected.

3. The union of the UK has strengthened because;
   a) the DUP success in NI has strengthened the Union. 

   b) thankfully, Ms Sturgeon and her calls for a 2nd Scottish Referendum has been neutered, 

   c) Nick Clegg, Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson lost their seats and were unceremoniously dropped from Parliament. This will help to further mitigate the noise and unnecessary disruption coming from that quarter.

4. The size of the majority in the House of Commons should have no impact on EU Brexit negotiations.... it will be down to the steel, grit and tenacity of the negotiating team that will win the day. They need a responsible, strong leader to preside over them, not a infighting, backstabbing body of people all scrambling for the throne.

5. The rise of Ruth Davidson in Scotland, politicians and people should note that Ms Davidson is an absolute credit to the Conservative Party and Scotland.

6. Dealing with the Islamic Terror Threat: As a result of the three recent terrorist attacks in London and the blame that was pointed towards May's 6 years as the Secretary of the Home Office.... social media shows that May certainly has a strong mandate to take HARD actions and TOUGH steps against terrorism in the UK; May, certainly now, has that mandate to focus on stopping terrorism in the UK:

   a) The DUP understand the fundamentals of the religious wars over the centuries, this will help May to get laws in place that will help stop and neuter terrorism.

   b) The public have been baying in social media for decisive action to be taken against those 3,500 known Jihadi's, such as rounding them up, fingerprinting, biometric scans, DNA capture / registration, deportation, confiscation of their passports and cancellation of the British citizenships and being branded a traitors of the UK. 

   c) Strengthening of the UK Borders, more resources, more physical checks and the prohibiting entrance to anyone on any Government terrorist watch-list, or those returning from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq or Saudi. 

   d) Amending the Human Rights Act to: 

    i. ensure that an individual's human rights are forfeited by any persons committing or inciting acts that grievously harm persons or inflict cruelty to persons or animals,

   ii. do not let the human rights issue prevent deportations or incarceration of these terrorists.

7. Both Ms Sturgeon and Ms May have been humbled, both of them believed they were infallible and began to get too big for their boots and were totally deluded, suffering illusions of grandeur because they were drinking their own cool-aid.

8. Whilst Jeremy Corbyn did not manage to win sufficient of a majority to become Prime Minister and install Labour into the halls of power .... he has however, done this country a great service, he slapped down Tony Blair's ambitions to create another middle of the road political party, which would be filled with insidious progressive ideas and their globalist elitist machinations.

9. This hopefully puts an end of Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and New Labour. Corbyn's triumph was the final nail in the coffin of New Labour. Blair and Mandelson were hoping that Corbyn would fail spectacularly allowing a PREGRESSIVE moderate Labour Party to rise from the ashes. This essentially, puts a block on any new middle ground party forming as the left wing of Labour has been strengthened, thanks to Jeremy Corbyn.

10. The Conservative should have learned a lot from this election and if they apply the learning's, they will be well placed to capture the middle ground in the future;

11. As suggested by the Islamic Council, MI5 should work with all the Muslim Mosques in the UK, which they feel should be monitored and rewarded for identifying and reporting people who are promoting extremism, radicalisation and hate crimes. 

12.   To be a party that cares for ALL the people, the Conservative Party MUST adopt MANY of the points mentioned in the Labour and LibDem manifesto's to offer hope for the younger generations as they are the future of this great country. (See manifesto comparison table below.) 

   a) This is the second general election where the internet has played the largest part in communications with the populace, something the Conservative Party failed to harness. (Yet again).

   b) Conservative Party should readily adopt and employ a social media strategy that enables people from all walks of life to engage with the Conservative party as Labour have done.

   c) The Conservatives desperately need a persuasive campaign solution that includes a broad dataset so that the younger generations who do not have the historical background can read up on non-political-biased informative data, on which to base their voting decision. EDUCATION / CONVERSATION / PARTICIPATION. 

   d)  If the Conservatives want to survive, they MUST build up alliances with the younger generations, if they fail to do this, the Party will VANISH into oblivion over the next decade. The younger generations are the future..... The Conservatives had better WAKE-UP or they will find they are irrelevant quite soon! 

   e)  Politics needs an Online Presence with a Symbiotic Communication Forum: The 2017 campaign disaster could have been avoided if Party Members had access to a LIVE feed-back loop between Grass-Roots members into the Party and Campaign HQ: Sadly, even with all the fantastic social-media technology, there was yet again absolutely NO feedback mechanism that was monitored and responded to iteratively between members of the parties.... instead the Conservative Party used their membership lists as a one-way conduit, spamming members for donations and reminding them to vote. 

   f) The Conservative Party campaign machine is sadly, somewhat wanting in the Internet and new age of social media in comparison to the Labour machine. If the Conservatives want to survive, this must be remedied as soon as possible so that a following of younger generation can be built up.

IN CONCLUSION:

Now if ever there was a time for everyone in the UK to pull and work together, that time is now.

Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn should forget the petty politics, they should stand shoulder to shoulder and fight for the best deal possible from the EU.  This is NOT a time to DIVIDE and RULE.... this is a time to act as a United Kingdom, for the sake of the people, our children and their children.

We need grown up politics, not childish bickering and innuendo across the aisle. We are a United Kingdom and a proud nation, so let's act as such and show the world what the Bull Dog spirit is all about.

If Theresa May was smart, she would pay heed the many suggestions (above) made by millions and incorporate them and many of the Manifesto points highlighted into a People's Manifesto, re-launch this as the way forward for a UNITED country, for the people, for the United Kingdom.

We should all be reminded how we arrived at this place intime..... here is a reminder:

How we ended up having to have this BREXIT in the first case...

https://positics-constitution.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/just-how-did-uk-come-to-have-referendum.html

APPENDICES: 

Comparison of Manifestos and a strong recommendation for Prime Minister May!

You may not have been aware of this, but a lot of BREXIT supporters spent several hundred hours inside the political quagmire of blogs over the last month, where they learned about the points people were interested in. Below you will find comparisons of the manifestos, which were done by the BBC and the Daily Mail, which has been brought together and colour coded based on comments within the blogs about what people wanted and did not want to see in a manifesto.

Putting aside any political bias, the analysis was done on earmarking those items that had more popular hits versus those that received less popular hits.  Those items marked in GREEN were deemed suitable to see in an all-rounder manifesto, whereas those marked in RED were deemed unsuitable for an all-rounder manifesto.

There were obviously significant overlaps across the three main parties, so editing of the points or reshaping of their narrative were not undertaken.

If the Conservatives were serious about doing what is right for the people, they would seriously consider taking on ALL the points marked as GREEN and create a composite People Manifesto for this next 5 years.

Primary Pledges
Conservatives: Main pledges #    Deliver a smooth and orderly departure from the EU #    Increase NHS budget in England by £8bn a year by 2022/23 #    An extra £4bn on schools in England by 2022 #    Restating commitment to bring net migration down to tens of thousands #    Balance budget by 2025 #    Replacement of triple-lock pension pledge after 2020 with double lock		Labour: Main pledges #    Bring an end to austerity and invest heavily in public services #    Negotiate a Brexit deal that "puts the economy and living standards first" #    Nationalise a number of utilities including rail, post, water and the National Grid #    Increase taxation on business and the highest paid #    Invest in the British economy through a £250bn stimulus package #    Abolish tuition fees for university students in England	Liberal Democrats: Main pledges #    Hold a referendum on the final Brexit deal, with the option to remain in the EU #    Add 1p to income tax to fund the NHS and social care #    Rule out coalitions with the Conservatives or Labour – but want to make the Liberal Democrats the official opposition #    Increase spending on early years, schools and colleges in England #    Reverse some benefits cuts
Tax and the economy
Conservatives: 1)      Savings of £12billion more than Labour through cutting waste and bureaucracy. 2)      Reduce Government borrowing by £8 billion, leaving £4billion for tax cuts - still to be specified. 3)      Achieve a balanced budget by 2025 4)      Rule out increases to VAT 5)      Stick with current plans to raise personal tax allowances and cut corporation tax 6)      Review the business rates system		Labour: 1)      No increase in the basic or higher rates of income tax. 2)      No extension of VAT on a range of items. 3)      Targeted tax cuts for families and to support work. 4)      £21billion of savings through reducing waste and cutting 80,000 civil service jobs. 5)      Introduce a £250bn stimulus package over 10 years 6)      No increases in personal National Insurance or VAT 7)      Reintroduce a 50p tax rate and raise income tax for those who earn over £80,000 8)      Raise corporation tax rates to 26% by 2020/21	Liberal Democrats: 1)      Abolish the council tax and replace it with a local income tax and introduce a new 50p top rate of tax on incomes over £100,000. 2)      Money raised to be used for spending on priority areas. 3)      Child trust funds to be scrapped. 4)      Balance day-to-day spending while reducing national debt as a proportion of GDP 5)      Add 1p onto each rate of income tax and ring-fence the money for NHS and social care 6)      Borrow £100bn to invest in infrastructure, including housebuilding, broadband, schools, hospitals and transport 7)      Reverse some planned cuts to corporation tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax
Crime
Conservatives:   1)      5,000 more police officers each year and paperwork to be slashed. 2)      Early prison release schemes to be scrapped and 20,000 new prison places to be created. 3)      A tenfold increase in drug rehabilitation places.		Labour:   1)      Neighbourhood policing teams for all communities. 2)      24,000 extra community support officers and 12,000 police officers freed up for frontline duties. 3)      All prisoners to be supervised on release. 4)      Legislation to introduce ID cards.	Liberal Democrats:   1)      10,000 more police on the streets and an extra 20,000 community support officers. 2)      Non-violent criminals to do tough community work as an alternative to jail. 3)      Plans for ID cards to be scrapped.
Foreign and defence
Conservatives: 1)      Give strong support to international institutions including the UN, Nato, Commonwealth, G20, G7 and WTO 2)      Become a global champion for free trade, signing new trade deals around the world 3)      Continue to spend 0.7% of national income on international aid 4)      Meet the NATO target to spend at least 2% of national income on defence, with above inflation increases each year	Labour: 1)      Order a strategic defence and security review 2)      Commit to spending 2% of GDP on defence 3)      Continue to spend 0.7% on international aid 4)      Roll out a "Homes for Heroes" programme that will insulate the homes of veterans for free		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Commit to spending 2% of GDP on defence 2)      Maintain 0.7% GDP commitment for international aid 3)      Suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia 4)      Maintain a minimum nuclear deterrent
Health and Care
Conservatives: 1)      Patients' right to choose hospital or have 50 per cent of the cost of the operation paid by the taxpayer if they go private. 2)      Matrons' power to close dirty wards in crackdown on MRSA "superbug". 3)      £8bn increase to NHS England budget compared to current level by 2022/23 4)      Include value of family home in means test for people receiving social care at home 5)      Cost of care to be capped and people guaranteed to keep £100,000 of assets once care bill paid 6)      Allow deferral of care bills until after death to ensure no-one is forced to sell family home	Labour: 1)      NHS patients' right to choose any hospital offering operation at NHS prices. 2)      Waiting times to be cut to maximum of 18 weeks. 3)      Expansion of private sector provision within the NHS. 4)      Consultation on new hospital hygiene laws. 5)      Commit to more than £30bn in extra funding for the NHS in England over the next five years 6)      Reverse privatisation and return health services into public control 7)      Guarantee access to NHS treatment within 18 weeks and A&E within four hours 8)      Lay the foundations of a National Care service and put an extra £8bn into social care over the next five years		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Free long-term personal care for the elderly. 2)      Free eye and dental checks. 3)      Fewer NHS prescription charges. 4)      Reduce "hidden" waiting lists for diagnostic tests. 5)      Add 1p onto each rate of income tax and ring-fence the money for NHS and social care 6)      Ensuring mental health care waiting time standards match those in physical health care 7)      Ensure that there are more nurses on hospital wards and in the community 8)      Introduce a Welsh NHS whistle-blowing hotline
Education & Family
Conservatives: 1)      Heads and governors to be given power to expel unruly pupils. 2)      600,000 extra school places to enable more parents to get first choice school. 3)      University fees to be scrapped but interest charged on student loans. 4)      Increase the overall schools budget in England by £4bn by 2022 5)      No school will have its budget cut as a result of the new funding formula 6)      End the ban on new selective schools 7)      Introduce T-Levels	Labour: 1)      More city academies. All secondary schools to become independent specialist schools. 2)      Failing schools to be taken over by successful ones. 3)      Maintenance allowances for poorer students to stay in education after 16. 4)      Abolish university tuition fees and reintroduce maintenance grants 5)      30 hours of free childcare for two-year-olds in England 6)      End the public sector pay cap for teachers 7)      Restrict primary class sizes to 30 and introduce free school meals for primary school children		Liberal Democrats: 1)      University tuition and top-up fees to be abolished with maintenance grants for poorer students. 2)      21,000 more primary school teachers to be recruited to cut class sizes. 3)      Spend £7bn extra on education, increasing school budgets and the Pupil Premium 4)      Oppose grammar schools 5)      End the 1% cap on teachers' pay rises 6)      Reinstate maintenance grants for the poorest students
Asylum and immigration
Conservatives: 1)      Withdrawal from the Geneva Convention on refugees with an annual quota for asylum seekers. 2)      A points system for immigrants with Parliament setting annual cap on numbers. 3)      A new border police force to be created. 4)      Reduce net migration to tens of thousands 5)      Double the Immigration Skills Charge on companies employing migrant workers 6)      Increase minimum earnings threshold for family visa sponsorship 7)      Toughen requirements for student visas and rules allowing them to stay and work	Labour: 1)      A points system for immigrants 2)       Only skilled workers allowed to settle long-term. 3)      Entrants to UK requiring visas to be fingerprinted. 4)      ID cards for visitors staying more than three months. 5)      More failed asylum seekers to be removed. 6)      Freedom of movement will end when Britain leaves the European Union 7)      Reinstate the Migrant Impact fund in areas where immigration has placed a strain on public services 8)      Take students out of immigration numbers 9)      Recruit 500 more border guards		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Asylum seekers to be allowed to work to end dependence on benefits. 2)      Responsibility for assessing asylum claims to be transferred to a dedicated agency. 3)      Support the principle of freedom of movement between the UK and EU 4)      Allow high-skilled immigration to support key sectors of the economy 5)      Remove students from official migration statistics 6)      Welcome 50,000 Syrian refugees over five years and re-establish the "Dubs" child refugee scheme
Housing
Conservatives: 1)      Build "fixed-term council houses", sold privately after 10-15 years with automatic Right to Buy for tenants 2)      Build one million homes by end of 2020 and 500,000 more by end of 2022 3)      Build 160,000 houses on government-owned land 4)      Implement the Homelessness Reduction Act to halve rough sleeping	Labour: 1)      Introduce controls on rent rises 2)      Suspend the right to buy policy 3)      Build at least 100,000 council and housing association homes a year 4)      Make available 4,000 additional homes for rough sleepers		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Set target to build 300,000 new homes a year 2)      Create 10 new garden cities in England 3)      Stop right to buy for housing association tenants 4)      Allow councils to charge 200% council tax on foreign-owned empty homes
Welfare and pensions
Conservatives: 1)      Replace pensions triple lock with guarantee that increases after 2020 will at least match inflation and average wages 2)      Means-test Winter Fuel Payments "focusing assistance on the least well-off pensioners" 3)      Keep other pensioner benefits, including free bus passes and TV licences 4)      Give more power to the Pensions Regulator to protect private pensions	Labour: 1)      Keep the pension triple lock and benefits for pensioners, such as the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes 2)      Review the benefit cap, universal credit and reinstate housing benefit for under 21s 3)      Increase employment and support allowance by £30 per week 4)      Increase carer's allowance by £11 a week		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Keep the triple lock on pensions and free bus passes 2)      Withdraw winter fuel payments for wealthy pensioners 3)      Reverse cuts to Universal Credit 4)      Uprate working age benefits in line with inflation
Future of the UK
Conservatives: 1)      No decision-making that has been devolved will be taken back to Westminster 2)      No Scottish independence referendum before the Brexit process has played out, after that only if there is public consent 3)      Move significant numbers of civil servants outside London and the south east 4)      Create a United Kingdom Shared Prosperity Fund	Labour: 1)      Establish a constitutional convention to examine and advise on reforming Britain's constitution 2)      Reduce the voting age to 16 3)      Oppose an independence referendum in Scotland 4)      Create a role of Minister of State for England		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Home rule for each nation within a federal United Kingdom 2)      Keep the Barnett formula for Scotland and Wales but seek to increase the Welsh block grant 3)      'Devolution on demand' for regions of England 4)      Oppose Scottish independence
Brexit
Conservatives: 1)      Leave the single market and customs union, while seeking a “deep and special partnership” with the EU 2)      Secure a "smooth and orderly Brexit" while maintaining that "no deal is better than a bad deal for the UK" 3)      Determine a "fair settlement of the UK’s rights and obligations" in our withdrawal from the EU 4)      Pass a Great Repeal Bill to convert EU law into UK law	Labour: 1)      Scrap the Brexit white paper and replace it with a fresh set of negotiating priorities with an "emphasis on the single market and customs union" 2)      Immediately guarantee rights of EU citizens living in Britain 3)      Replace the "Great Repeal Bill" with an EU rights and protections bill that will ensure no change to workers' rights or environmental protections 4)      Reject "no deal" with the European Union as a viable option		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Hold a referendum on the final Brexit deal, with the option to remain in the EU 2)      Unilaterally guarantee the rights of EU nationals in the UK 3)      Stay in the single market and customs union 4)      Support the principle of freedom of movement between the UK and EU - the right to work, travel, study and retire abroad
Transport and environment
Conservatives: 1)      Investing £40bn across the rest of this decade on transport improvements 2)      Work with train companies and employees to agree to minimum service levels during industrial disputes 3)      Expand Heathrow airport 4)      Remove the "complexity and perverse pricing" of rail tickets	Labour: 1)      Renationalise Britain’s railways as franchises expire 2)      Let local councils take over bus services if they wish to 3)      New clean air act to legislate against diesel fumes 4)      Ban fracking		Liberal Democrats: 1)      Introduce a diesel scrappage scheme 2)      Extend ultra-low emission zones to 10 more towns and cities 3)      Set legally binding target of zero net greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 4)      Oppose fracking

LOSS OF PATIENCE WITH POLITICAL INCOMPETENCE... REQUIRES RATIONAL MINDS, CONSTRUCTIVE IDEAS AND COMMON SENSE TO SOLVE THIS.

The World as our Grandparents knew it.... is Unravelling.

The whole world was reminded recently with the Manchester terror event and political shenanigans in the West that the world is no longer a wonderful safe place to live. The 22 souls that were murdered by Manchester bomber Salman Abedi illustrated the gulf between a rational mind and an evil mind that is twisted by religious dogma and pent-up anger and frustration at the incessant interfering of the West in Middle-Eastern affairs.

There has been for a while.... a melancholic mood about Western politics that is causing citizens, irrespective of their political leaning, in Western countries to feel similar frustration and helplessness as that of these individuals such as Manchester bomber Salman Abedi.  We saw examples of this when people supporting the left, marched and protested the elevation of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States and when the VOTE-OUT of EU campaign won the BREXIT vote in June 2016.

There is no escaping that frustration levels with the Establishment, Politicians, Bankers, global Corporations and the System are elevated to an alarming level.  Politicians for too long have been making promises at the election stage, which they have pointedly not delivered on or have changed their minds on once they are in the halls of power.  We saw this over and over again with Presidents Clinton, Obama, Prime Ministers Blair, Cameron and President Trump; for example, Trump stated that as President, he would cease interfering in other Country affairs, stop America being the Policeman of the world and be non-interventionist, which the whole world witnessed was an unadulterated lie when he bombed the Syrian state...... simply to boost his rapport with the deep-state machine in America.

Many thought Trump was the 'reset-button' that was going to 'drain-the-swamp', stop the WAR MONGERING interventionism and dismantle the deep-state.  For a while there was a true feeling of HOPE in the air.  Millions upon millions prayed that this was the man to do just that after the cataclysmic failure of the promised HOPE that rapidly evaporated under the Obama reign. Citizens have become beyond being disillusioned with politics, they are now becoming frustrated and angry like those Muslims that have become radicalised because of their massive discontent of the immoral behaviour of the West and how American foreign policy treats Muslims in the Middle-East.

The mood of the populace in many Western countries is of discontent, frustration turning to anger and dissatisfaction, which is gradually rising to boiling point. It is notable that over the last 50 years, the conservative populace who have a leaning the from middle to right of the political scale have not protested in rallies where violence has reigned as part of their strategy to get their point heard. This has been the way of the left leaning populace, much of which has been borne out of their Socialist expectations for state hand-outs, which the Capitalist political machine believes are rights that should be worked for instead of being gifted. 

Now, we have a situation where those on the right, normally of conservative values are talking about taking to the streets because the system is so corrupt and broken, they feel they have been silent for decades in the interest of social harmony. The patience of those conservative leaning people has run out...... once they marshal the masses and take to the streets, we have the potential to have a civil war between the socialist thinking versus the conservative thinking populace with the Police and Army in the middle.

BEFORE MI5 or POLICE KICK DOWN MY FRONT DOOR, LET ME STATE, I AM NOT INCITING CIVIL WAR, ONLY WARNING EVERYONE, THAT THE TELEMETRY OF ALL POLITICAL UNREST AND DISCONTENT IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM ARE POINTING TOWARDS THAT TRAJECTORY.

World peace is a naive dream in today's world because of corruption at all levels.

 

Did you know there are only 11 countries in the world that are actually free from conflict - this is a very sad indictment on the present political system, the establishment, our politicians and the foreign policy of a few Arms selling - war mongering countries.

So if ever, there was a time for a new breed of politics, now would be that time; before both sides of the divide step-up and march in protest due to their total dissatisfaction..... this would be the beginning of a real civil war. A rational mind would suggest that both those on the left and those on the right are so fed up with the current political machine with their lies, political mistruths, truth manipulation and outright election promise failures.

The ingredients for a joined-up 'left & right' civil unrest are all there, which requires people to be rational thinking, unemotionally 'A-political' and of common need.  What is missing from the politics of today in INTEGRITY in Politics and Government. This should be the common need...... INTEGRITY in Politics and Government.

What does one mean by INTEGRITY in Politics and Government.... let's look at a single example that is one amongst hundreds of examples that people could cite;

Theresa May's track record on Immigration: 

According to Wikipedia:  From 1999 to 2010, Theresa May held a number of roles in the Shadow Cabinets of William Hague, Iain Duncan Smith, Michael Howard and David Cameron, including Shadow Transport Secretary and Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary. She was also Chairman of the Conservative Party from 2002 to 2003.

After the formation of a coalition government following the 2010 general election, May was appointed Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities, giving up the latter role in 2012. Reappointed after the Conservative victory in the 2015 general election, she went on to become the longest-serving Home Secretary since James Chuter Ede over 60 years previously. During her tenure she pursued reform of the Police Federation, implemented a harder line on drugs policy including the banning of khat, oversaw the introduction of elected Police and Crime Commissioners, the deportation of Abu Qatada, the creation of the National Crime Agency and brought in additional restrictions on immigration.

According to the London Standard Thursday 1 December 2016, Immigration hit record 650,000 in Theresa May’s last year as Home Secretary.

Also, according to the Guardian Monday 18 July 2016, her most recent Immigration Act was designed in her words “to create a hostile environment” for illegal migrants by a package of measures including requiring landlords to check on the immigration status of all prospective tenants. This culminated in the infamous Operation Vaken “Go Home” vans touring immigrant communities and as a result of which only 11 people actually left the country.

When the net migration figures came out – as they do every three months – May always sent out her immigration minister, James Brokenshire, to explain why they had failed yet again to deliver the promised deep cuts in net migration.

Yet, nett immigration still hit record 335,000 in Theresa May’s last year as Home Secretary!

Net immigration was a near-record 335,000 over the period in which Mrs May was in charge of the UK borders — just 1,000 short of the all-time peak of 336,000 recorded a year earlier.

The massive numbers revealed by the Office for National Statistics left in tatters the Government’s target to reduce net levels to the “tens of thousands”.

In cabinet, she quite rightly blamed the rest of the government for giving up on tackling rising immigration and turned down their pleas to remove overseas students from the target. But she pressed ahead with immigration policies that included splitting up an estimated 33,000 families in Britain because they don’t earn enough and refused to put any time limit on the detention of immigration detainees.

So who is really to blame, the Politicians, Parliament, the Government, Customs & Immigration or the System?

Frankly, they have all contributed in some way to the problem, BUT the primary blame lies with the progressive attitude of the lame-stream media and liberal judges, who suggest that immigrants have a higher / better form of rights than the indigenous populace in each country. This is what Politicians are fearful of..... being singled out by the media as a racist or right-winged nutter.

Collectively, they are all somewhat guilty of being grossly incompetent and unpatriotic towards their home country, irrespective if you are in America, UK, Europe, Canada or one of the other English speaking countries.  They failed to deliver on an election promise.

So what can realistically be done to make this a better world, unlike the hell-hole the PROGRESSIVES have left us with?

Firstly, the populace need to agree on some basic principles that are good for the country and thus for our individual well-being. 

FOR EXAMPLE:  (Here are 12 items pulled from various blogs).

1.    Countries should foster environments where economies can be prosperous where taxation is based primarily on consumption with tax scaled on earning levels.

2.    Countries should foster commercial environments where everyone can accumulate wealth and not be forced to exist on a hand to mouth basis as the system forces millions of people to do presently.

3.    Countries should foster environments where those who are disabled and unable to fend for themselves can be cared for by the state.  

4.    Countries should foster environments where Corporations are taxed for sending their work abroad, thus enabling local inhabitants to secure well paid remuneration for a hard days work.

5.    Countries should foster environments where pay gaps between the lower paid and the Directors of the business are not so enormous as has been witnessed in the last two decades.   

6.    Countries should foster environments where crime does NOT pay with a DETERRENT where criminals who commit crimes that hurt persons or animals forfeit their human rights and are punished severely.

7.    Countries should foster environments where immigration is based on merit, not numbers and reduce immigration to 10's of 1,000s.  

8.    Countries should foster environments where the lame-stream-media are held accountable for misinformation and are fined punitively for fake-news - known by the sensible as manipulation of facts to suit their political narrative.

9.    Countries should foster environments where lobbying or favours for election funds is illegal; hence, elections are funded from a central election pot, out of taxed monies, so that Political Parties all have the EXACT same sized marketing pot; this would require massively punitive jail sentences for all of those who overspend or contribute private funds to promote a political party and all news papers, television, radio or other media forms are forced by law to have a fully balanced output or forum or panel etc..... to ensure that the days of a left or right media are eradicated.  

10.  Countries should foster environments where Judges can be held accountable for adjudicating on trials where they let their personal and political narrative reign as how they rule on trials.

11.  Countries should foster environments where all forms of commerce is taxed, which includes Corporations, selling of drugs and prostitution where both should be regulated for health and personal security reasons; this will help to eradicate drug lords and pimps who exploit vulnerable persons.

12.  Countries should foster environments where education in our schools are not selling the PROGRESSIVE crap that is undermining the very fibre and integrity of our society, where children are being brainwashed by this insidious PROGESSIVE poison.

In Conclusion:

The rational mind knows, there is a distinct difference between Civil-Unrest and Civil-War, yet seemingly for many, when emotions are clouding one's judgement, it is hard to tell the difference.

The present system of corrupt politics, biased corrupt media and liberal / progressive infiltrated government is manifesting an environment for civil war because of the pitting of the Left against the Right every 4 years for elections that everyone knows are a FARCE and waste of time because they will simply get the same old drivel.

Every time an election  happens it is more of the same old lies, false promises and cronyism once the party that wins gets into the halls of power.  This has to change.

As already mentioned, Citizens have become beyond being disillusioned with politics, they are now deeply frustrated and angry like those Muslims that have become radicalised because of their discontent of how the West behaves.

If our politicians do NOT take heed of these rising ingredients of unrest in the general populace, there will be blood in the streets in places like the UK.  It is not a hypothesis, or a vision,  it is fast becoming a reality as all the trajectories of discontent are directed towards the melting pot of "FRUSTRATED-HELPLESSNESS" as yet another general election looms in a few days time.

Just try to imagine the unimaginable;  If as an indigenous Citizen of your beloved country, you lose control of your country to people who are part of the global elite PROGRESSIVE movement, where 99% of the populace are considered as part of the unwashed-sheeple. Can you imagine the utter frustration and helplessness you will feel when 'goose-stepping' Progressives dictate the terms of the rest of your life, so that they can continue with their globalist campaign of making themselves and their crony friends wealthier based on your hard toil.

WAKE UP PEOPLE..... 

THE PROGRESSIVES HAVE INFILTRATED EVERY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, POLITICAL PARTY, CORPORATION AND SCHOOL or UNIVERSITY. 

Vote wisely on the 8th of June!

Do NOT let these insidious PROGRESSIVE Global Elitists who started the EU agenda take over your country.  

Stand UNITED as ONE PEOPLE, put aside your emotional political hatred..... 

Think United Kingdom and support the one person, Theresa May who is best placed to complete the BREXIT and secure the UK's future for your children and their children's children.

Sigh.......

Bang...... whoosh... thwaddock.... oops that must be the Goose-stepping EU PC Police kicking down my front door. 

Bye......

LABOUR'S MANIFESTO IS A THROW-BACK TO 1983 LABOUR

According to the Guardian this morning, Labour is braced for a battle over the final version of the party’s manifesto at a summit for its most senior figures on Thursday after a draft was leaked overnight.


Whilst a draft of the document appears to set out the most left-wing election platform for decades, amounting to his 'wish list' for Labour's union paymasters, as strange as it may be, there are a few items in this Labour Party manifesto, which would resonate with the millions of commuters who are being overcharged for a poor rail service each day and those people who have been left behind in the housing market and are unable to get onto the housing ladder.

Leaked Labour manifesto reveals plans to renationalise railways and Royal Mail

Includes plans for a £6billion tax raid on people with salaries of £80,000-plus

Parts of Jeremy's 2017 manifesto have the hallmarks of mass renationalisation and forcing of Councils to build 100,000 homes for social rent. Andrew Gwynne, the party’s elections chief, said the package of reforms, which includes radical plans to take parts of Britain’s energy industry back into public ownership alongside the railways and the Royal Mail, would be “genuinely transformational”.

The ELEPHANT in the room as usual is........ HOW WILL ALL THIS BE PAID FOR?

So when average Mr or Mrs Bloggs (UK Citizens) hear Tim Farron of Liberal Democrats saying, "Britain should take 50,000 more Syrian refugees from camps in the region, which will only cost circa £4.3bn investment, which the party believe is worth the investment",  they must think that these politicians have totally lost the plot.

Sadly, the cost of these things hardly factor into the thinking of the voting public, because over the last 4 decades, most of the enlightened UK Citizens have come to realise that it either boild down to borrowing or raising taxes, which ALL the parties claim in their manifesto's not to do, yet as soon as they are in the halls of power, that is exactly what they do.

According to the Daily Mail, among the most striking measures in the document are:

• A refusal to commit to cutting immigration levels, and removing rules that new arrivals must have enough money to support themselves;
• Ruling out leaving the European Union without a deal, weakening Britain's negotiating hand and suggesting Brexit might never happen;
• Trident will be renewed but there will be a 'full' defence review, and the manifesto bows to Mr Corbyn's unilateralist views by making clear a Labour PM would not deploy them; 
• A slew of huge spending commitments including scrapping moves to push the state pension age beyond 66, scrapping university tuition fees, £6billion a year more for the NHS, £250billion on infrastructure.
• Rent caps for the first time since the 1970s, abolition of laws limiting strikes, and pay caps to stop bosses earning more than 20 times the lowest salary at their firm; 
• A promise to protect the 'nomadic way of life' and 'end discrimination against Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities'; 

Even though Mr Corbyn and shadow chancellor John McDonnell will claim the final manifesto will be 'fully costed' at first glance even from a civilian in rented accomodation it will be apparent that with new spending pledges running into hundreds of billions of pounds, it surely means that Labour would embark on a gigantic borrowing spree, as well as levying swingeing taxes on business and the middle classes.

 

IN CONCLUSION

It is clear that Jeremy Corbyn is a red-blooded socialist, which sadly does not bode well for him because not only has every socialist country failed numerous times, Jeremy is not able to bring his own party with him to his journey back into the heady days of the 1983 39-page manifesto from Michael Foot.

If Jeremy were really in touch with the UK Citizens at all levels of society, he would learn that some of his points in the manifesto did indeed resonate with many, but sadly there are some points like the 'nomadic way of life' and 'end discrimination against Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities' will stick in their craw because of the tortology this statement becomes when a check with reality is made.

That said, the Conservatives could take some tips from a few of his points, such as the threat of our essential Utility operations, (Gas, Electricity, Water, Railways) being in the hands of unscrupulous foreign corporations. This threat is a reality that could one day come to hurt the UK, especially post BREXIT, notwithstanding the billions in profits that are extracted from the UK every year.

So, a message to the Conservatives, instead of backing and partaking in fox hunting, why not consider these external threats to the UK and not scoff at Jeremy over your english tea later today.

THERE ARE FINANCIAL BUBBLES BREWING IN A FEW AREAS

If you thought we were out of danger of a financial crash similar to what we experienced in 2007 / 2008, you would be naive in thinking that.

Here are but a few examples where massive bail outs are being sought, which publicised minimally in the mainstream media;

Notwithstanding the property bubble in the UK that continues to grow, there are too big to fail organisations that are in very deep debt.  In the aftermath of Brexit, much of the investing public's attention has turned to Italian banks which are in desperate need of a bailout as a result of €360 billion in bad loans growing worse by the day

1.  Italy has asked the EU for assistance as they are circa two trillion Euros in debt.  Middle of 2016, after the BREXIT vote in the UK, Italian politicians begged the European Union for permission to bail out troubled lenders sitting on more than €360bn of bad loans.

2.  The German Banks have also been exposed to large debts, so much so that they have asked for assistance from the EU.  As reported by Tyler Durden of Zerohedge   "In Europe, the bailout does not need to be so large. A €150 billion program should be enough to help European banks recapitalize," said David Folkerts-Landau.

As far back as September 2016, there were fears raised that Deutsche Bank might have to tap its investors for cash are among the reasons its shares have plunged, and raised fears that it could present a Lehman Brothers-style moment for the markets. However, top bankers and policymakers all played down the prospects of a repeat of the collapse of Lehman in 2008 as reported by the Guardian.

In addition to this old chestnut, there are other areas where a bubble is building, like hire purchase loans for automotor vehicles where lending is going off the charts like housing mortgages in the lead up to the 2007/2008 crash.

The report below, which is an example of these other areas has been  Authored by John Rubino via DollarCollapse.com,

One of the interesting things about the Great Recession was how Canada’s financial system sailed through it largely unscathed. Its banks were regulated wisely and behaved prudently, its citizens avoided the extreme stupidity of their credit-addicted neighbors to the south, and its government refrained from doubling its debt every eight years. It certainly looked like Canadians were smarter – or at least more emotionally mature – than we were.

But instead of Americans learning from Canada, Canadians appear to have concluded that America had it right after all. In the decade since the global financial system’s last near-death experience, Canadians have started to behave like turbo-charged Americans. A few recent examples:

Canadians Are Buying A Record Number Of New Cars, With A Record Amount Of Financing

(Better Dwelling) – Sales of new motor vehicles across Canada rose to an all-time record for February.



Average Sale Price For New Vehicles Rises

Consumers are purchasing more expensive vehicles too. Over $5 billion was spent on new vehicles for the month, bringing the average to $40,100 – up 3.4% from the same time last year.



Consumers Are Buying “More Car Than They Can Afford”

The uptick in average sale price is due to longer financing terms for buyers. According to the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), Canadians are “increasingly purchasing more car that they can afford,” due to longer financing becoming fashionable. The agency notes that average leases have crept up 2 months, every year since 2010. According to the Bank of Canada (BoC), the average loan was 74 months as of 2015. Longer terms bring down monthly payments, but increases the total cost of the loan.

The Rise Of Non-Prime Lending In The Auto Industry

The right to debt seems to be a topic all Canadians are embracing, and the auto sector is no different. The Bank of Canada has estimated that 25% of borrowers are non-prime, which in case you didn’t know is Canadian-English for “sub-prime.” These buyers generally have a FICO score below 670, and face predatory loans with up to 25% interest. This makes it difficult to build positive equity on car loans.

————————–

IN CONCLUSION

We can expect more financial heartache, which will undoubtedly impact Europe, UK and America.  Do not be fooled by all the political hype during these upcoming elections, where the issue of BREXIT is being blamed for all the financial woes of the UK, Europe and the rest of world.

None of this should be a surprise to you, but in many cases many people will find this is very surprising because the Lame-Stream media are not reporting extensively on these issues, many of these issues that are being raised in different quarters of the world because it goes against their narrative.

HOW DID THE UK COME TO HAVE A REFERENDUM FOR BREXIT ?

Notwithstanding the fact that it was the Conservative Party that signed away the keys to Britain's  sovereignty when John Major signed the Maastricht Agreement on 7th February 1992, it was New Labour that implemented this travesty with the gusto of people who were drunk with power and dizzy with their own self importance and ego.

The Maastricht convergence criteria are the criteria for European Union member states to enter the third stage of European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and adopt the euro as their currency.

The first pillar of the Maastricht Agreement was where the EU's supra-national institutions - the Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice - all had the most power and influence, which superseded that of the British Parliament. The other two pillars were essentially more inter-governmental in nature with decisions being made by committees composed of member states' politicians and officials. While the Justice and Home Affairs pillar extended cooperation in law enforcement, criminal justice, asylum, and immigration and judicial cooperation in civil matters, some of these areas had already been subject to intergovernmental cooperation under the Schengen Implementation Convention of 1990.

History will show that, the 28 EU Commissioners of the European Union were and remain drunk with their new found power.  The lust for power of this unelected body that are living in a world filled with delusional plans of grandeur, are sadly misleading and hurting the indigenous people of both Europe and Britain.

This power grab and injustice only became glaringly obvious to many hard working intelligent Britons, the erosion of British sovereignty and Britain’s culture really began in earnest when Labour, under Tony Blair won the UK General Election in July 1994. This was the acceleration of the PROGRESSIVE GLOBALIST agenda, the  PROGRESSIVISM aberration driven by ego, arrogance and the lust for power.

Tony Blair rebranded old Labour to “New Labour” and promised modernisation. On the day after their election victory, Gordon Brown surprised everyone by handing control of interest rates to the Bank of England - a move that would have far-reaching consequences for the UK economy.

After reading this,  you will better understand how Great Britain was nearly sold out as a pawn for political gain in the Globalist’s insidious liberal PROGRESSIVISM strategy and was going to be subsumed as a prize in the morass of the European Union.


ABOUT HOUSING SHORTAGE and HIGHER HOUSE PRICES.

New Labour’s economy under Tony Blair & Gordon Brown flourished as they opened the borders to allow an influx of immigrants to help create a cheap labour force and a migrant forced demand for housing, which put pressure on existing housing stock.

New Labour’s immigration strategy fuels housing demand and feeds the price bubble igniting an explosive buying and selling frenzy.

Cronyism became New Labour’s way forward with the chattering classes, liberal media folk, luvvies, wealthy-elite as well as show-biz, media folk and political elites who endorse Progressivism.

House prices continued to rise for 15 years. Over most of this period, house prices rose well above the general inflation rate generating a considerable wealth effect.


EXPOSING THE ECONOMY FALSEHOOD

Gordon Brown started using the “No more Boom or Bust” strap line every time he stood up to speak in parliament. This was based on an economy that was under pinned by a runaway booming property market that generated billions in taxes, both directly from stamp duties and capital gains as well as indirectly through corporation taxes and VAT from the additional monies flowing in the retail market place when home sellers spent their housing bounty.


IMMIGRATION WAS WHY UNEMPLOYMENT ROSE CONSISTENTLY in the UK

Between May-Jul 1997 to Mar-May 2010, the unemployment level increased from 2.1 million to 2.5 million an increase from 7.3% to 7.9%. The salary differential between immigrants and UK Citizens enabled Corporations to make UK Citizens redundant and swap them out for immigants under the guise of new jobs. This was seen especially in the middle tier jobs such as those in IT, where the big Banks brought in droves of foreign IT staff from India on rotational contracts.  This happened under the very noses of the Government who were the lapdogs of Corporations in the New Labour haydays.


THEY PLANTED AN IMMIGRATION TIME-BOMB

Immigration records show that net migration grew in 1998 from 48,000 to 140,000 under New Labour deliberate policy of loosening immigration controls in almost every sector. This eventually settled at near 300,000 immigrants per annum before New Labour was dethroned.

These policies accounted for two thirds of the 3.6 million net foreign migration under Labour.


THE PROGESSIVE AGENDA

Blair's 2004 decision to open the door to East European migration was entirely in keeping with his values as an ardent pro-European and globalist.

This created a systemic cultural and personal financial disaster for every hard working Briton. Alarmingly this Progressive agenda was later continued by the Coalition until David Cameron stood down after the June 2016 BREXIT vote.


IMPACT of IMMIGRATION

Massive demand for houses, causing a house pricing boom, plus a large supply of cheap labour in holding down wages which was, of course, welcome to the powerful business lobby.


IRREPARABLE DAMAGE TO UK Plc

To compensate for Gordon Brown’s 1997 tax raid of circa £100 billion on Corporation pensions; Corporations stopped increments to staff pension contributions, by putting salary increases on hold until 2017.

Any increases to cover inflation were dealt with via end of year bonuses. Whilst corporations saved some funds, this meant there were less tax receipts for HMRC due to lack of salary increases. The workers were royally shafted by this mechanism because payments into their pensions from their employers were shrunk for 19 years.


THEY DAMAGED the ECONOMY

Whilst New Labour had a plentiful supply of cheap labour that helped the UK economy to expand without facing the issue of spiralling wages, they short-changed UK citizens on many ways.

There were ALSO these unforeseen losses HMRC tax suffered due to NO salary increases offered to UK citizens over this 15 year period.


IN SUMMATION OF ALL THE DAMAGE THEY CAUSED

1. The misguided Immigration policy adopted by New Labour, allowed 3.6 million souls to enter this country over 17 years.
2. This spawned the emergence of UKIP and helped create four- or five-party politics in the UK for the first time.
3. This put excessive pressure on existing housing stock and forced housing prices to skyrocket.
4. This caused UK salaries to flatline, which caused HMRS to lose out on several tens of billions in tax receipts since 1997.
5. This caused 100s of 1,000’s of UK citizens to lose their jobs due to being undercut by cheaper imported labour on cleverly constructed contracts exploited by corporations like the big Banks.
6. Globalisation strategy saw 10’s of 1,000’s of UK jobs being outsourced abroad.
7. This shortfall in tax revenues between 1999 and 2002 triggered Gordon Brown to stupidly sell the UK’s gold at a discounted price, when gold was at a 20 year low, simply to bail out an American Bank and to balance the budget.
8. Labour threw open doors to mass migration in secret plot to make a multicultural UK, this was done without asking the people what we wanted.

ONE EXAMPLE OF CRASS STUPIDITY THAT IS UNFORGIVABLE

Between 1999 and 2002, Mr Brown ordered the sale of almost 400 tons of the gold reserves when the price was at a 20-year low. Since then, the price has more than quadrupled, meaning the decision cost taxpayers an estimated £7 billion, according to Mike Warburton of the accountants Grant Thornton.


THE FARCE OF NEW LABOUR’S POLICIES AND THE DAMAGE THEY ARE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR IS EXPOSED

Finally, when the true immigration figures were released, the penny dropped for everyone why the housing prices were so inflated.  The “No more Boom or Bust” game was truly exposed for the lie it was. New Labour systematically destroyed Great Britain Plc.

Unfortunately, due political hatred against the Conservatives and UKIP stirred up by the media, it took a full 15 to 17 years before the populace woke up to the farce New Labour had dragged them through. It was only then at the 2010 General Election, where they voted in Conservatives and Liberal Democrats who formed the COALITION that finally dethroned New Labour.

The public finally began to see through the aberration of the PROGRESSIVISM policies and extensive damage caused by the flawed policies Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s New Labour.

Sadly, due to political marketing spin, hype and lack of political integrity, the Coalition carried on with this PROGESSIVISM charade until the public finally began to understand the full ramifications of the New Labour and Coalition lies and deceit over the previous 19 years until Nigel Farage forced the BREXIT Referendum in 2016.

Britons in years to come, will look back on this period of history and commend Mr Farage for his wisdom and tenacity in following through with this mission under extremely trying circumstances and pressure.

The moral of the story is that people should be less emotionally tied to a political party because of inherited prejudices, such as the fact that their parents voted for "X", therefore it was good enough for them to do the same, or because the left leaning liberal press persistently bad mouth a political Party or brand their policies racist, simply to shut them up, when the left are losing the argument.

People should NOT be lazy, they should do their homework and research the topic from NON mainstream media, who have been proven time and time again to play towards a globalist, liberal narrative, which as this paper has illustrated, appears to have been a gargantuan cataclysmic failure of epic proportions.


CONCLUSION

We are all Brexiteers, whether we like it or not, so it is time to pull together and all start rowing our boat in the same direction. If we fail to do this simple thing, Britain stands to lose a lot more than what New Labour did in those seventeen years of Progressive lunacy.  We need to grow up as a culture and start supporting policies over people, logic over emotion.

Every British citizen should put their political differences aside and pull together in a united cohesive supportive block and look for the positives in what life could look like post the Brexit. We must get behind Theresa May, give her our support and put the GREAT back into Great Britain.